Services · AI consulting
The machine takes the drudgery. You keep the judgment.
AI consulting for Australian businesses: where AI saves real hours, what it should never be allowed to touch, and how to be ready for the Privacy Act changes that start on 10 December 2026. It starts with a phone call.
Who this is for
Owners and leadership teams who know their people are already using AI, officially or not, and want it done properly. They are using it to write quotes, summarise meetings, clean up spreadsheets and draft replies, and many of them have not mentioned it.
Businesses with a job that eats hours every week and a suspicion that a machine could take it. Boards asking questions that nobody in the building can answer yet.
Where the call usually leads
- One process, measured. Pick the job that eats the most hours for the least thought, put AI through it under supervision, and count what you got back.
- Systems, not prompts. AI wired into your data and your workflow, with clear limits on what it can see, touch and send.
- An AI policy people follow. One page your staff will actually read, and a register of what is being used and by whom.
- Privacy Act readiness. Finding the decisions your software makes about people, so the December disclosure can be written from facts.
- AI security. What each assistant, agent and connector can reach, and what happens if someone turns it against you.
- A senior technical head, part time. For decisions that need someone in the room. What a fractional CTO actually is.
The AI whisperers
Left alone, AI is a very fast way to be wrong at scale.
Everyone has the same tools now. The businesses pulling ahead are the ones who worked out how to think alongside the machine, and where to keep people firmly in charge.
Call us the AI whisperers. We talk the machines round so your people don’t have to. The machine takes the drudgery. People keep the judgment, the empathy and the responsibility. Anyone selling you the version where the machine keeps all three is selling you a liability.
The December change
From 10 December 2026, organisations covered by the Privacy Act must state in their privacy policy the kinds of personal information they use in automated decisions that could affect people’s rights or interests, and the kinds of decisions those are.
Your lawyer can write that paragraph. What they cannot do is tell you which decisions your business actually makes with software: the scoring rule in the CRM, the rostering tool, the triage queue, the chatbot that decides what a customer is told. Finding those is technical work, and it is ours.
We are not lawyers, and we will say so. We hand your legal adviser something they can work from.
How it works
What it costs
Starts with a call
The first conversation costs nothing and commits you to nothing.
Work that follows is scoped and priced in writing before it starts. Some of it is a day. Some of it is a standing seat at the table.
Who does the work
Luke Elin, who leads Ey3, builds AI systems as well as advising on them, including generative AI engineering for a Queensland government department. He has taught cyber security and works as a red teamer, which matters here: most people advising on AI have never attacked anything, and most people who attack things have never built an agent that had to survive a real business.
We also run our own business this way, and we have got it wrong in public. Our write-up of the sixteen AI articles we published after only skimming them shows what happens when nobody keeps the judgment.
Common questions
Is our data used to train someone else’s AI?
We are not ready for AI. Where do we start?
Do we need an AI policy?
What does the December 2026 change mean for us?
Will you tell us to stop using AI?
Next step
Tell us where the hours are going.
We will tell you straight whether AI can take them, what it would cost, and what it should never be allowed to touch.